|
Post by artie on Oct 12, 2011 16:23:50 GMT 10
Post questions and one of our forum ref's or someone else that knows will give you their opinion,hopefully they will be right with their response
|
|
|
Post by Stevie G on Oct 12, 2011 16:52:20 GMT 10
Artie you have opened a can of worms here....should have some interesting posts !!!!
|
|
|
Post by Stevie G on Oct 12, 2011 16:52:56 GMT 10
Ohhh...and remember I'm just a linesman....
|
|
|
Post by (•̃_•̃) the ball on Oct 13, 2011 0:22:49 GMT 10
This board should get plenty of use once the season starts.
I suggest every question to have its own thread to avoid confusion on which response is for what question.
|
|
|
Post by sydneysnow on May 9, 2012 18:32:14 GMT 10
In recent match one of our defenders went shoulder to shoulder with opposition both trying to gain control of ball ref blew whistle and cautioned our player gave the opposition a direct free kick, there was no pushing with hands or violence towards other player, they were running shoulder to shoulder both fighting for possession of ball I'm confused about decision can someone explain it I was standing in as manager and was abit lost on that one. Thanks
|
|
|
Post by shinpad on May 9, 2012 19:31:26 GMT 10
Obviously, you have no idea Mr Stand In Manager. I can only imagine how you carry on from the side line. Here's my answer to your question, the referee didn't see anything wrong. He just felt like blowing his whistle and giving a free kick to the opposition. Happy with that, are we ?
|
|
|
Post by ballboy on May 9, 2012 20:13:06 GMT 10
Not necessary, shinpad.
sydneysnow, the referee saw a foul and called. He may then have cautioned your player, being guilty of consistently infringing the laws of the game.
|
|
|
Post by shinpad on May 9, 2012 21:06:39 GMT 10
Rubbish, He gave the free kick to stick it up sydneysnow for all the mouth he was giving out.
|
|
|
Post by sydneysnow on May 9, 2012 21:21:22 GMT 10
She not he and I sit on bench with subs we don't call out from bench but were back to your name again why shin pad that's right been kicked in them so many times as said in prior post your lucky you weren't kicked elsewhere mind you that name would suit you better
|
|
|
Post by sydneysnow on May 9, 2012 21:22:40 GMT 10
Ball boy thankyou he prob did see prior fouls that we didn't
|
|
|
Post by shinpad on May 10, 2012 16:46:39 GMT 10
sydneysnow,
Well said, I'm impressed. I was wondering how long it would take. For your information, I have been kicked in the, you know where, a few times. If I had to choose between the name shinpad or balls, I prefer shinpad thank you very much.
|
|
|
Post by sydneysnow on May 11, 2012 14:25:56 GMT 10
Lol agreed this name suits much better thanks for Information as said have no referee knowledge was just interested and when boys on bench asked me I was at a loss now I can say it was prob a prior foul we missed cheers
|
|
|
Post by The Villans on Jul 5, 2012 11:43:17 GMT 10
What's the law with the speed players need to leave the field when making a substitution? I've watched thousands of football games some run off, jog off, and most walk off! A player in a Youth League game was Yellow carded when being substituted, he was on the far side of the field and was slowly jogging over to the bench, and walked the last 30 metres not slowly just a normal walk and the referee carded him? He was fouled in a previous challenge and we decided to just sub him instead of sending the physio out, there was about 4 minutes remaining in the match? Is there a law on how fast they need to leave the field, is a referee allowed to tell the player to hurry up and get off? Is that in the laws? Surely he would just add some time if he thought it was necessary!
|
|
|
Post by (•̃_•̃) the ball on Jul 5, 2012 12:36:18 GMT 10
The Villans, The only law relating to this is that "delaying the restart of play" (or killing/wasting time) is a cautionable offence. The referee makes the decision on this based on the circumstances, one of which is the speed with which the player leave the field of play. And based on your post I'd say a fair caution unless you where behind on the scoreline which would have made it a completely different story. Three big signs were there: - Substituting a player from the far side of the field - Very near to full time - Walking for 30 meters As i said if you were behind on the score line it would have nullified all the above. If the player was actually injured he should/could have got off the field at the nearest side/goal line. Hope this helps.
|
|
|
Post by The Villans on Jul 5, 2012 16:34:24 GMT 10
Well not really, let me phrase the question another way is a player allowed to walk off when substituted irrespective of the score or where he is coming from on the field. So if we are behind 1-0 and a substituted player walks off and then later in the game we are ahead 2-1 and the again a substituted player walks off but this time is carded, that is absolutely ridiculous you are either allowed to walk off when substituted or you are not. I don't think it is matter of wasting time, it is consistency. It is the same when a goal keeper has been taking his time to take goal kicks the entire game but then all of a sudden in the last 5 minutes of a game he is told to hurry up! The referee is there to enforce the laws of the game, he shouldn't be changing his perception or view on things depending on how much time is left, or what the score is or what he thinks is fair or not. If he has allowed it from the start he should continue to referee the game in the same way IMO. Thoughts?
|
|