|
Post by tarzan on Nov 29, 2014 18:01:40 GMT 10
Not much substance there...more name calling so mustn't know enough about football to add anything constructive or debate a football point. And one of those initials you mentioned..ha, ha ya kidding!
You rubbish the curriculum ( a football framework ) yet see value in Coerver....that's a serious sign that football has possibly left you behind.
|
|
|
Post by tyrion on Nov 30, 2014 7:22:59 GMT 10
Yes I thought there was value in the Corver program and yes there is also value to be found in the new curriculum. The Coever program was a skills based program that thought the core skills also thought players to be individuals and to have the confidence to use the skills learned. I don't believe the current ciricculam addresses or provides the coaching for the skill level required for players to get to the top level. That's all
|
|
|
Post by twocentsworth on Nov 30, 2014 8:37:04 GMT 10
Our biggest downfall is 6-12 year olds...Coerver or the old Brazilian Soccer Schools programme, or similar, should be the backbone of every grassroots club in Australia..that's the curriculum for that group. Then you can start overlapping 10-14yr olds with the SAP like programme- extra nights.....that becomes the curriculum. After that you start grading and developing further for FNSWI and FFA CoE, dependent on ability..not nepotism (did I say that ). When you research, it's not the 10 000 hours that's the winner for development, it's the 10 000 touches A DAY. The hours are a measure of persistence and dedication to practice AND training.
|
|
|
Post by tarzan on Nov 30, 2014 8:49:46 GMT 10
Yes I thought there was value in the Corver program and yes there is also value to be found in the new curriculum. The Coever program was a skills based program that thought the core skills also thought players to be individuals and to have the confidence to use the skills learned. I don't believe the current ciricculam addresses or provides the coaching for the skill level required for players to get to the top level. That's all The "Curriculum" is a far broader framework for football in Australia rather than simply a training program. I believe that all youth age players need at least one additional session per week focussed solely on skills development. If you are aiming to be a pro footballer ( which most are not) then absolutely you need more skills sessions ...whether on your own or as part of an academy. You can't expect to do 4.5 hours of trainng per week and come out the other end a pro player.
|
|
|
Post by tarzan on Nov 30, 2014 8:54:45 GMT 10
Our biggest downfall is 6-12 year olds...Coerver or the old Brazilian Soccer Schools programme, or similar, should be the backbone of every grassroots club in Australia..that's the curriculum for that group. Then you can start overlapping 10-14yr olds with the SAP like programme- extra nights.....that becomes the curriculum. After that you start grading and developing further for FNSWI and FFA CoE, dependent on ability..not nepotism (did I say that ). When you research, it's not the 10 000 hours that's the winner for development, it's the 10 000 touches A DAY. The hours are a measure of persistence and dedication to practice AND training. If a coach only has 3 to 4 hours per week with players - the approach now is that it needs to be spent on more than Coerver tricks. Outside of this 3-4 hours Coerver like training can be a good thing.
|
|
|
Post by tyrion on Mar 19, 2015 21:53:18 GMT 10
receiving with your back foot, etc, etc. You didn't need to know much about the game to teach tricks and flicks outside of a game and to convince kids that the best player was the one who could juggle the most. Read more: nswyouthfootball.proboards.com/thread/3176/urgent-coerver-coaching-needed#ixzz3UpcCV6dwTarzan , this quote of yours really got me thinking , "recieving with the back foot" I've tried to coach it to my SAP players but failed Any demos anywhere
|
|
|
Post by tarzan on Mar 20, 2015 6:16:41 GMT 10
receiving with your back foot, etc, etc. You didn't need to know much about the game to teach tricks and flicks outside of a game and to convince kids that the best player was the one who could juggle the most. Read more: nswyouthfootball.proboards.com/thread/3176/urgent-coerver-coaching-needed#ixzz3UpcCV6dwTarzan , this quote of yours really got me thinking , "recieving with the back foot" I've tried to coach it to my SAP players but failed Any demos anywhere A loaded question?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2016 23:36:22 GMT 10
Bring Back the most successful training program on the planet. Coerver is the word.
|
|
|
Post by tarzan on Sept 7, 2016 8:57:06 GMT 10
Bring Back the most successful training program on the planet. Coerver is the word. And rename it "YouTube Tricks and Flicks"...
|
|
|
Post by tarzan on Sept 7, 2016 10:28:28 GMT 10
Or another name for it might be........"Game Awareness, What's That?"
|
|
|
Post by noballsleft on Dec 31, 2016 21:37:05 GMT 10
My son took Coerver about 10 years ago at Seaforth (OG until he left it all to his sidekick near the end) and it helped his close game immensely. The reality is, in most cases, not more than 3 or 4 players per team are directly involved in the game at any given time. Not for everyone, though. And it sure as hell wasn't cheap. First touch, ball control, fast dribble/pass excercises -- all things a lot of younger players need work on.
|
|